By Patrick Horn ("Rishi")
Swami
Vivekananda says, “All the schools of Hindu philosophy start from the
Vedanta or Upanishads, but the monists took the name to themselves as a
speciality, because they wanted to base the whole of their theology and
philosophy upon the Vedanta and nothing else. . . . This is the non-dualistic
Vedantism. It is too abstruse, too elevated to be the religion of the
masses. . . . Yet there are a few brave souls in the world who dare to
conceive the truth, who dare to take it up, and who dare to follow it to
the end.” The question inevitably arises, “How do we know?” Vedantic
epistemology is not mere intellectual cogitation but the means to
discern Truth. Vedanta offers three steps to absorption in Brahman:
revelation, reasoning, realization. First, it is necessary to hear about
it. Then, questioning and testing. Finally, in integrating the insights
gained from study, contemplation, and direct experience of the Real,
there is nothing further to be known.
Swamiji teaches three divisions of orthodoxy: nyaya-vaisika (rational-atomism), samkyha-yoga (statistical-metaphysics), and mimamsa-vedanta (testimony and scriptural authority). There are six valid methods of knowledge: pratyaksa (sense-perception of the empirical world), anumana (inference divided into reasoning from cause to effect [a priori Platonic deduction – the Way of the Thunderbolt] or from effect to cause [a posteriori Aristotlean induction – the Way of the Serpent]), upamana (comparison -- a is to b = c is to x), arthapatti (postulation – if y, then z), anupalabdhi (negation), and sabda (witness to the sensible and suprasensible that does not contradict logic). Oral or written witness from a trustworthy source is the most potent instrument for knowledge transmission. Confidence in the words of an authority need no verification.
Swamiji teaches three divisions of orthodoxy: nyaya-vaisika (rational-atomism), samkyha-yoga (statistical-metaphysics), and mimamsa-vedanta (testimony and scriptural authority). There are six valid methods of knowledge: pratyaksa (sense-perception of the empirical world), anumana (inference divided into reasoning from cause to effect [a priori Platonic deduction – the Way of the Thunderbolt] or from effect to cause [a posteriori Aristotlean induction – the Way of the Serpent]), upamana (comparison -- a is to b = c is to x), arthapatti (postulation – if y, then z), anupalabdhi (negation), and sabda (witness to the sensible and suprasensible that does not contradict logic). Oral or written witness from a trustworthy source is the most potent instrument for knowledge transmission. Confidence in the words of an authority need no verification.